forum zespołu muzyki folk Portfolk

cheapbag214s

A stark choice on defense spending
In his latest "major" speech on foreign policy,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Mitt Romney argued yesterday he'll push NATO allies, many of which happen to be pursuing austerity measures, to significantly boost their very own defense spending. How would a Romney administration do that? Apparently, the Republican has a lot of faith in the persuasive abilities.
But at home, Romney is much more ambitious. As President Obama twice noted in last week's debate, the former governor is seeking "$2 trillion in military spending the military hasn't requested." That's on top of the additional spending Romney has planned for entitlements,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and also the trillions in tax cuts the Republican demands.
See that green line? That is what the nation would invest in defense if Obama is re-elected. Begin to see the yellow line,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]? That's Romney's proposed Pentagon spending.
As Rachel put it, "People say there is no real difference between the candidates? Holy mackerel! When you are referring to the largest pile of money in the whole world, the biggest amount of discretionary investment property on anything by our government -- boy, howdy, is there a difference here. Boy, howdy, does this election matter."
Incidentally, so how exactly does Romney plan to pay for all this additional defense spending? He will not tell anyone -- the GOP candidate expects to obtain elected first,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], then he'll let Americans in on the details of his plans -- though Big Bird looks like it's in big trouble.
For that record, PBS gets about $400 million annually from Congress. Romney intends to spend one more $2 trillion on the Pentagon -- along with the cash already being spent on defense.
As for why america, which already spends more about our military than most of the major powers combined spend on their militaries, must increase defense spending by this kind of enormous amount, Romney hasn't exactly explained that, either. Apparently,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Americans would be in for quite an education at the begining of 2013.
Romney is anticipating World War III, and he would be the type of a fool to start it. He's no clue what he is doing. He won't be happy until he fills up the entire World leaving The united states standing alone by itself. He is sicker than Hitler, that you can believe. Any man that will lie, cheat and deceive the way that he is doing is capable of doing totally annihilating our planet. So far he has were able to pull the wool over 1 / 2 of the American population. He is possessed also it isn't by worthwhile spirit that I can tell. He's lost his mind, and noone sees it except the 47%. He is signing our death notice using our very own blood, sweat and tears. It's up to all Americans to determine through this facade and send him to where he belongs, within his own egoic hell that he has created for himself.
Neo cons happen to be relating mundane events unfolding in to the cleverly leading apocalyptic hilarity from the somber sounding byte , W W III , since (a minimum of) 1999 . Cue in Chopin's death march watching too paid actors playing journalists revel in their astonishment in the gravity in hot air , for cash , again .
This certainty has been barely dodged umpteen times but , maybe it is time to fear again .
A paralyzing drinking game leading to alcohol toxicity , "How often can Billy Kristol be wrong !" , as well as gentleman your glasses please .
#2.2 - Tue Oct 9, 2012 9:05 AM EDT
After 9/11, the Republicans learned that there is Big Money in "Be afraid, be very, very afraid!"
Eisenhower's advice to 'beware the Military/Industrial Complex' didn't envision the large domestic marketplace for "fear solutions" to non-existing issues that are generally expensive and useless. ("Take off your shoes, please, and put those nail clippers in the waste bin. You have a choice: walk-through this machine or submit to a strip search.")
Somewhere George Orwell is considering a suit for Theft of Intellectual Property!
Mitt Romney and the other raging neo-con hawks have miscalculated. Their aggressive rhetoric on foreign policy and relentless bashing from the president's record underestimates the support Obama is wearing foreign policy and also the complete disgust among the public with any talk more neo-con military adventures which will hit America hard in the pocketbook along with the lives in our soldiers. We do not need war with Iran. This agenda is out of touch with both reality and also the sentiment of most voters,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]. - progressive
Angel#77
Should you remember also, the Republican candidates for President brought this subject up. Noone was referring to Iran, until they started to. I think it all began as a ploy to find the backing and support from Adele Stevenson( I believe I spelled his name wrong). If Israel is instigating and picking fights with Iran they have to settle it, they have decided to use the political platform to handle their own agenda. Cash is like candy towards the Republicans and they'll do anything for it. They're having fun with fire particularly when they chose to use Iran in their game. Iran doesn't play games,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it sickens them to think that Republicans are using them as a tool within their pursuit of Money.
This discuss Iran is actually stupid with everybody strutting their position about this nuclear weapon problem. When you are aware what will happen anyway. Iran will push their position as far as they are able to with this particular nuclear weapon issue in which they aren't really stupid about. If Iran would keep pushing for a nuclear weapon; they know what is going to happen and that is they will obtain the crap bombed from them. The gap is between President barack obama and Romney. President Obama will handle it more appropriately and Romney just really wants to cause another war with senseless killing. Why these Republicans have to be so war nuts is beyond me, except maybe they are trying to prove they are men which is really stupid. There's more to men than just wanting to fight and kill constantly and puffing out your chest like an idiot and senseless killing without any real brains behind it. Men showing they were given testosterone constantly have to crawl their butts into a cave,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], stay there, and never come out again. Because ultimately, it simply doesn work for women, except misery, despair, violence, and death with no food up for grabs for families.
Angel#77
I'm along with you, women are sick of war. The ladies of this Earth demand that the men stop fighting. They're scaring us,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], they're putting themselves and us in a very bad situation constantly. If they truly love the women and kids they're defending they will never get another weapon again. They need to learn how to settle their differences like grown men and stop behaving like Peter Pan playing army constantly in the woods. I don't want to play anymore, I usually experienced trouble for it after i was young because someone always ended up hurt. Listen to your Mothers, wives and daughters stop the violence.
Well, you need to admit, he did have a profound effect on the British during his trip during the Olympics. Brow-beating allies into spending more on defense, which seems to be the only real Republican method of dealing with people (and something that seems to work very well about the spineless) will clearly certainly work on Europe, who are, I think everyone realizes, just chomping at the bit for a go back to Bush-style foreign "diplomacy."
Sure hope the geniuses in Democratic messaging have figured a method to pithily point this to the general public but .
Ugh, war great for profiteers! (sure people kill and get killed and yes war breeds hatred and well yes war never really solves the underlying conflicts but profits are good)
WWI beget WWII which beget the Korean war which led us to inventing a cold war which beget McCarthy then we bounced back with Viet Nam. Then your Bushes gave us the wars in the centre East. So Mitt is obliged to double down on military expense,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych].
相关的主题文章：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

http://www.nifedipinerbzzp.fora.pl/most-often-metformin-hci-1000-mg-augmentin-generic-equipment,1/potter-star-wears-ballet-shoes,16941.html#17209

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

http://www.semper.fora.pl/public-questions-to-our-ally,1/mayor-tells-high-street-bike-riders-spun4,4650.html#6322

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

http://www.hardpartyprodss.fora.pl/hard-party-production,3/andrew-bynum-should-offer-to-play-for-team-usa-wit,5514.html#5550

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

http://www.glucophagebcabs.fora.pl/bayard-had-the-fly-not-talk-eed-some-sprinkler,1/arthur-freeman-convicted-of-daughter-darcey-s-murd,5116.html#5140

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]