cheapbag214s
Kapitan jachtowy
Dołączył: 27 Cze 2013
Posty: 20086
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/5 Skąd: England
|
Wysłany: Pią 3:09, 30 Sie 2013 Temat postu: Our new era of identity politics-spun5 |
|
|
Our new era of identity politics
Can we ever see the end of identity politics? In 2004, headlines heralded the end of race as we know it. Since Obama was elected in the United States, much has been manufactured in our new,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], supposedly post-racial society. However in the past few years, we also seen the rise of the new type of right-wing identity politics led by conservatives like Glenn Beck and neo-feminist Sarah Palin. 11, when identity became crudely constructed into two camps: pro-American/anti-American or pro-Islamic/anti-Islamic. In Europe, where I was at the time, there was this moral panic about the presence of Muslims and people were talking with techniques which were verifiably ridiculous. There is talk in Britain about how homegrown bombers were a brand new thing when Britain was barely from the war with Northern Ireland and it has been growing its own bombers for centuries. The sense of how it saw itself in the world resulted in an attempt to reconfigure its historical image to demonize Muslims. So, I figured there was a contribution I could make to speak about these items more intelligently.
So, what determines which areas of our identity are meaningful beyond our individual experience? Being tall, for example, isn regarded as essential as as being a woman.
For identities to be meaningful as social identities, we are able to entirely own them. Let say you had been a beer-swilling, sexually promiscuous, nominal Muslim American named Ali Aziz on Sept. 10, 2001; on Sept. 12 another group of things came around for you personally that you simply didn choose. They might have no bearing on what you think about yourself or the way you live life, but suddenly you being asked to vouch for certain things and receiving treatment in different ways. This really is likely to bring about a transfer of who you are, not on the basis of anything you done, but how everybody around you understands you. So,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], we don choose our social identities entirely, but we all do possess some say about how we start working through that fictional composite character. One comes with a chance to decide not to answer for Islam whatsoever in order to be devoutly Muslim or renounce the religion or change one name. We now have those choices, but the moment will often choose us around we would choose it.
After i walking or driving in the future during the night in some regions of America, the fact of my race can become a really big deal because I am a black guy, whereas in the areas in other times it can be really insignificant. But in both situations,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], I the same guy.
Right. Therefore the concept of our identity depends on our surroundings.
Thinking of identities as being part of a set hierarchy is a terrible mistake. Being gay and black doesn imply that person has it two times as bad as a straight white woman. The type of mess some white feminists got into with the 2008 presidential debates between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. They suggested that somehow a black male candidate been with them easy, which it was much worse to become a white woman candidate, that is just crazy. Not that it had been harder for Obama than her. It just the the discussion weren helpful to either of them.
One of the numerous reasons this is an obstacle is the fact that identities aren fixed in place and time. Their meaning and relevance is always shifting. As much as anything, this book is definitely an attack on essentialism, because one thing essentialists have always tried to do is suggest there's a fixed notion to what and who we're. Actually, we are lots of things to many people while also being something to ourselves. Whatever else has been said about Hillary Clinton, nobody questions her being born in the usa or claims she's a Muslim. They've certainly said other things demeaned her based on her relationship together with her husband or etched out every laugh line, crease and wrinkle but identity should not be a competition. And if it is designed a competition, then everybody loses.
But doesn all electoral politics involve boiling people into identities: black,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], white, woman, man, Christian,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Muslim?
It more sinister than that. In electoral politics, a black person or a white woman still has the problem of getting to persuade people they can do the job equally well as a white man to get elected. But there is a means in which diversity can be, as Angela Davis said, difference which brings no difference, the change which brings no change. Bangladesh recently had a presidential campaign between two women, but nobody indicate that means women in Bangladesh are doing very well. The world is full of types of individuals from underrepresented groups gaining more power with no status from the whole group increasing. One of the paradoxes of Obama presidency is the fact that African-Americans have never felt better about their devote American politics, yet they rarely fared worse economically and socially.
In India, there are quotas for marginalized groups in government positions, therefore the issue gets to be more about whether elected people from those segments of the human population are actually functioning on behalf of these groups and many times they aren
My feeling about affirmative action is that if you hold on there, then obviously it is inadequate, but these things do have to be kick-started. In great britan the Labour Party were built with a short time where they'd women-only shortlists in support of women could stand it local primaries in a few constituencies. This was since deemed illegal, however in the period when it happened there is a sharp rise in women [running for office]. And lots of them are there or have risen closer to the top. Nothing suggests we ought to leave the issue of discrimination towards the good sense and kind will of powerful majority groups. It quite rare within the good reputation for discrimination that individuals have quit their ability. The question is, How can you intervene to make those changes? If partial changes, like simply having a quota of ladies in power, are so far as you going, there's a chance that could be worse than nothing.
When people like Bachmann wanted or Bobby Jindal are lauded as progress for women and people of color, it really drives home the truth that electing people purely depending on their race or gender isn a terribly good idea.
Typically, and this is certainly true with women,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the right continues to be better at promoting underrepresented individuals because they are only represented as individuals. They aren by any means linked to a broader group collective struggle. The best only permits people to become elevated who're not tied to the requirements of the women movement,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], gay rights and so on: Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, Angela Merkel. The left has a harder time with this. Whenever you voted for Jesse Jackson in the you had been voting for an agenda that will result in racial uplift. Whenever you voted for Margaret Thatcher, you were only voting for Margaret Thatcher. You weren voting for women equality.
T he left attempts to play both angles, to its detriment.
What is intriguing, and this was true for Obama and Hillary, is when the left feels the requirement to dance round the tension from the symbolic elements of their candidates. At one moment Hillary would talk about punching holes within the glass ceiling, and also at another she'd say her gender was irrelevant. Obama used the anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr. Have a Dream speech to announce his nomination, then never acknowledged the anniversary outright. The symbolic nature of the candidacies are essential in that they can increase votes, so they want to harness it and galvanize around it, however they attempt to do it without ever being too identified with the broader questions associated with their identities.
You write in the book about gatekeepers, individuals who decide who and doesn belong to a specific group. A recent example is the brouhaha over bisexual men getting kicked out of a gay softball league for not being gay. Why kind of gatekeeping so dangerous?
When gatekeepers are official, they have an institutional capability to include or exclude. They modify the material conditions of individuals lives by making some lives hell yet others sweet. The example within the book is of 40,000 Jews in Israel being told they no more Jewish, which isn't an insignificant thing to occur to you in Israel. With an unofficial, social and cultural level, the impact is equally as real and relevant. A gatekeeper job is to say you can only do this and also you canrrrt do that. There is the cost of admission to be what you are, so if you want to be a member, this is exactly what you have to pay. And when you transgress this, then you definitely cast out. In order for that to work, philosophically, the nature from the identity needs to be fixed. It may change with time and circumstance. For gatekeepers to create sense, the identities they evoke cannot be fluid.
But if we think in our identities as fluid, won that make it harder to battle for the rights?
To some extent identities are becoming blurrier, but to a larger extent we simply beginning to recognize them as having been blurry. never was really a singular category, and within it there were gradations of mulatto, quadroon, octaroon and so on. But the nature of identity may also shift. Most of the recent protests within the Arab world, Spain,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Portugal and Greece happen to be youth-led. Age is an identity, even if at first glance it may not seem to be one, and contains been an effective vehicle through which to mobilize. No group is cohesive, but towards the extent it might be a mobilizing force, age was. In the last presidential election, became a significant mobilizing category, while was not a substantial mobilizing category. They thought it might be,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and Republicans certainly hoped it would be, however it wasn So, there's a selection of ways this really is and isn successful.
Therefore if we are able to eliminate identity politics, how do we bridge our differences?
There are three a few things i believe are important: empathy, imagination and solidarity. There's a million and one things I am never going to be. No matter how hard I try, being an Afghan lesbian woman isn't going to happen for me personally. But how difficult is it to place yourself in someone else shoes a little bit? You don need to walk miles inside them; you just need to try them on. When I hear many people discuss marginalized groups, it almost sounds politically autistic in the wherewithal to empathize.
In France they say Muslim women don want to wear the veil, that their husbands make them put it on. But we don really know that, will we? And we don think of it with regards to what women wear in the West high heels, for example that by all accounts are uncomfortable or bad for the body. What we wear isn't independent of the social expectations around us. It more complicated than that. There is an interesting moment fourteen days ago in Birmingham, England, in which a number of hijab-wearing Muslim women joined the SlutWalk since the idea was they support the right of people to wear what they want regardless of what it's or for what reason they put it on. I don think people feeling emotional brings about major telecomutting saves gas, however i think those are easy conversations to have. From them emerges empathy,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], which leads to acts of solidarity.
'Sex And also the City' Creator On 'The Carrie Diaries' And The Boys Before BigJoanne Tombrakos: 25 Lessons I Learned From My Bout Using the FluNASCAR's Danica Patrick Files For DivorceKate White: 31 Great Work Perks Individuals don't Tell You AboutNicola Kraus: Ladies' Night!
Susan Bloch: What Our Kids Teach Us About New Year's ResolutionsDean Baker: The three Percent Cut to Social Security: aka the Chained CPILeah McElrath: Why Jodie Foster's Golden Globes Speech MattersAntonia Blumberg: Instructions To Grandma: What Millennials Could Learn About FaithStephanie Bender: Take This Quiz And Reinvigorate Your Love life
13 Beautiful Photos Of the Very Snowy BirthdayDressing The Young Carrie Bradshaw41 Heart-Shaped DIYs To Actually Enable you to get Excited For Valentine's DayThe New Miss America Could Totally Be considered a Character On "Girls"The Secret Lives Of Sample Photo Models
相关的主题文章:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
http://www.nifedipinerbzzp.fora.pl/most-often-metformin-hci-1000-mg-augmentin-generic-equipment,1/mrs-nora-jennings-spun1,16925.html#17193
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
http://www.glucophagebcabs.fora.pl/bayard-had-the-fly-not-talk-eed-some-sprinkler,1/on-the-one-records-spun1,5100.html#5124
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|